Criteria Matrix
Compare every candidate against the same checklist and standards.
STEP 3 PUBLIC GUIDE · C01
The “Calculator Before Consensus” Type
An independent verifier who checks personal criteria before market sentiment.
Core decision process Criteria MatrixPersonal behavior score Calculated after self-check
Counter-Evidence Check
Deliberately look for evidence that contradicts your preferred conclusion.
Why this result appeared
This result appears when your answers favor direct verification and consistent comparison over recommendations or other people’s confidence.
How you usually decide
You tend to organize conditions and compare them before reaching a conclusion, even when others are already convinced.
Strengths in investing
You are less likely to be swept up by popularity and can compare candidates on consistent criteria.
Decision patterns to watch
Watch for analysis paralysis or overconfidence in your own framework.
Routine to reduce weak points
Define purpose → Fix comparison criteria → 3 reasons to buy → 3 reasons not to buy → Site check → Decide
Basis for this interpretation
Behavioral-finance research repeatedly examines overconfidence, anchoring, and herd behavior. Independent verification can be useful, but your own judgment also needs a deliberate re-check.
The label matters less than
the decision process behind it.
Even with the same overall tendency, outcomes can differ depending on what you check first, how you verify it, and where you stop.
Criteria Matrix
- How it works
- Compare every candidate against the same checklist and standards.
- Strength
- Makes it easier to compare consistently instead of following emotion or reputation.
- Watch for
- Your own checklist can also be wrong, so test the criteria themselves.
- Execution order
- Define purpose → Build criteria → Compare candidates → Check counter-evidence → Decide
Counter-Evidence Check
- How it works
- Deliberately look for evidence that contradicts your preferred conclusion.
- Strength
- Helps reduce confirmation bias and overconfidence.
- Watch for
- Searching only for negatives can make you undervalue real strengths.
- Execution order
- 3 reasons to buy → 3 reasons not to buy → Compare evidence → Decide
In real decisions,
separate these three moments.
Use the behavior pattern as a practical guide for moments that tend to repeat during an actual purchase process.
The stronger the first impression or recommendation, the more useful it is to separate why you are interested from the numbers that still need verification.
Your own checklist can also be wrong, so test the criteria themselves. When your usual strength is working strongly, check one opposing condition before moving forward.
Define purpose → Fix comparison criteria → 3 reasons to buy → 3 reasons not to buy → Site check → Decide At the last stage, stop searching for new positives and confirm that none of your pre-set criteria have been broken.
This is not a personality label.
It is a decision checklist.
Treat the behavior type as a way to notice when your strengths become excessive, not as a fixed identity.
Keep the strengthYou are less likely to be swept up by popularity and can compare candidates on consistent criteria.
Block the repeating mistakeWatch for analysis paralysis or overconfidence in your own framework.
Reinforce it with a routineDefine purpose → Fix comparison criteria → 3 reasons to buy → 3 reasons not to buy → Site check → Decide
TRY YOUR RESULTYour actual behavior pattern
Your actual behavior pattern
is calculated from 42 answers.
The public guide explains the structure of this behavior type. Personal results calculate the leading decision processes and their intensity from your actual answers.
※ This is not a personality test. It interprets your self-check responses through an investment decision-making lens.
Back to FIX BUILDING